Oboma-nation-Hellcare is a government takeover of our healthcare system… but more accurately, Abomi-nation-Hellcare is an act of government to seize control of 17% of the United States economy, with thousands of new provisions, regulations, taxes, fees, and penalties.
It’s not an overstatement to say that "Abomi-nation-Hellcare" system will change forever the lives of every single person in America and soon the world!
Abomination Hell Care (NEW FIGURES) will cost YOU $15,000 USD to "OPT" out. This will guarantee participation ... EVEN if you cannot afford it! DESIGNED TO TURN YOU INTO SLAVES of the anti-Christ global kingdom. Obama-Hellsnare IS the Devil's tool of SLAVERY and has been created to "KEEP TRACK' of mankind in "REAL TIME" !
Opting out of Obama-Hellcare will become prohibitive as the "system" is designed to "CAPTURE" everyone!!!
Most people have no idea that there is a new 40% tax on some healthcare plans or that the "Medicaid Parity Rule" will hurt seniors on Medicare. There are hundreds of other changes to how your healthcare will be defined and delivered.
Abomination-Hellcare IS the "TROJAN HORSE" of the (NWO), NEW WORLD ORDER ECONOMY. As the Abomi-nation-Hellcare hideous tentacles take hold of the United States economy, this social healthcare BEAST will become the model for a United Nations global version of the "program". This global program will be instituted and controlled by a world dictator who will ultimately and aggressively persecute anyone who dares to practice Judeo-Christian beliefs that conflict with politically correct dialog which will replace the 10 Commandments of Jehovah with a "NEW" set of "Comandates" that are enginered by the "man of lawlessness" and enforced by U.N.NWO LAW and blessed by the Fales Prophet, Pope Francis..
The “NWO” is the prophesied in the Bible and referred to as the anti-Christ, Godless global society existing at the time of the return of Jesus Christ. Abomi-nation-Hellcare is the definite instrument by which the United States economy will integrate into a “global” socialistic world order. A global version of "Abomi-nation-Hellcare" will be integrated through "The World Health Organization" (WHO), a specialized agency of the United Nations that will require a numeric tracking system to keep track of ALL humans enrolled in the “program”. This program will be systematically used by the United Nations to monitor and control the movement and behavior of members of a global society.
A “global version” of Abomi-nation-Hellcare will be funded by a “WORLD TAX”, and will be the foundation of the new global economy immediately following the global economic disaster of 2015-2016. This "Global Healthcare Tax" system will "underwrite" the government of an (anti-Jew / anti-Christian), anti-Christ world dictator also referred to in the bible as the "Beast" .
A current and future world leader is polishing his skills and developing his relationships with United Nations heads of state to establish his future position that will insure his vile, subhuman ambition to rule the world. This world leader, alive today in his current political role, is thrashing through centuries of law and principle, fundamentally changing everything that is sacred in order to "fit" his vision of a new world that will ultimately pay homage to him. This Bastard from Hell will serve as the Secretary-General at the United Nations sometime in the year 2016 and use this position to propel him to obtain his final wicked appointment in Jerusalem.
The United Nations “foreign” international laws are Increasingly imposing their will upon the independent constitutional sovereignty of nations around the world including the United States of America. This is evidenced by many examples including the restrictive United Nation’s gun laws that are subjugating constitutions of various nations including US Constitutional law to its own rule of law. You may be unaware that during the 2012 presidential election, UN observers were stationed around United States monitoring election poles during OUR ELECTION PROCESS. Soon all “PROCESSES” will be monitored by the UN under the authority of the World Health Organization "program". The "teeth" of the one world government.
All global citizens will be required under penalty of law and eventually penalty of death, to participate in a UN global healthcare program by receiving an assigned tracking number to comply with the UN directive. Without this number linking you to data files that contain an individual’s healthcare records, banking and other commerce information, a person will NOT be permitted to participate in the global healthcare system and will NOT “qualify” to engage in commerce, business, I.e. (buy, sell, eat drink, live).
HELP FOR DUMMIES: No one on the planet will be able to buy or sell, (engage in commerce) without an assigned personal number code assigned under the new healthcare system. This digital number will associate each person with a detailed database inventory that is uniquely linked to the individual and will be required to be carried on your body. (Revelation 13: 15-18)
The sin of "counting" people has everything to do with the purposes of the one who is doing the counting. If the “counter” ignores God by refusing to acknowledge that each individual is a Divinely unique created human soul, the process of counting people becomes an absolute abomination to God and, as the bible declares, anyone who allows themselves to participate in the “count” will be eternally lost and sentenced to eternal death. (Revelation 14:9-10)
David’s Sin in Numbering the People - Satan who provoked David to number Israel 2 Samuel 24:1-25.
Based upon all the available biblical information, the only sound conclusion that we can come to is that David did his counting with NO REGARD of the human soul and unique Divine individuality of each person. David numbered humans in pride. He wanted to determine how powerful Israel's army was. This confirmed by God declaring plainly that the number of the men that he counted were "those that drew the sword" (2nd Samuel 24:9-10). The offense to God concerning Israel was that David boasted in the power of "flesh" rather than boasting in the provisions of the Lord. It is perfectly clear that numbering Israel was "otherwise" a very lawful thing to do. E.g.: (Exodus 30:11-12)
"And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel after their number, then shall they give every man a (ransom for his soul) unto the LORD, when thou numberest them; that there be no plague among them, when thou numberest them." NOTE: A "ransom for a man's soul" is an acknowledgement that each man belongs to the Lord and is sanctified to God as a unique individual. (Numbers 1:1-3)
"And the LORD spake unto Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the tabernacle of the congregation, on the first day of the second month, in the second year after they were come out of the land of Egypt, saying, Take ye the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, after their families, by the house of their fathers, with the number of their names, every male by their polls;
From twenty years old and upward, all that are able to go forth to war in Israel: thou and Aaron shall number them by their armies."
Clearly we see that there was no inherent sin in numbering Israel IF each human being is acknowledged as unique and belongs to God who is his source of life. God Himself told them to do it on occasion. But when king David numbered Israel, we are told that he was motivated by sin because he was tempted by Satan to trust in flesh with no regard of the numbered of whom belonged to the Lord. David's pride was manifested.
He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666. (Revelation 13: 15-18) – BOZUNG
9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: http://www.biblegateway.com/audio/mclean/kjv/Rev.14.9-Rev.14.10
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire..."
A section of Abomi-nation-care makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as... Lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill. However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Described in the Abomi-nation-care law, the acronym CHIP, is used extensively throughout H. R. 3962 -- beginning at Title VII -- as well as throughout H. R. 3590. Initially the term CHIP does not refer to RFID chip implants, it is indeed the introduction of the “program” that will expand to include all people and without a doubt require an individual human tracking device that will be planted in the human body to control the integrity of the tracking system and keep accurate records of the lives of all whether enrolled in this hideous program or not. Presently, the acronym CHIP refers to the Children's Health Insurance Program, which is a program which provides free or low-cost health coverage for over seven million children -- both U.S. Citizens, as well as eligible immigrants -- up to the age of nineteen. If you are interested in learning more about CHIP on the Internet, you can go to such sites as the following one: www.insurekidsnow.gov/chip/index.html
Exchanges begin enrolling participants for 2014.
January 1, 2014 Individual and employer mandates commence, annual limits for essential benefits and pre-existing condition exclusions will be prohibited, and Health Insurance Exchange health plans commence. Small business health insurance tax: An annual fee on health insurance providers will be passed on to consumers. This tax will fall on the vast majority of plans that small businesses purchase, but not on self-insured plans (such as most big business and labor union policies). The fee is $8 billion for 2014, $11.3 billion for 2015 and 2016, $13.9 billion for 2017, $14.3 billion in 2018. For years beginning 2019, the $14.3 billion figure will be adjusted upwards for the growth in medical costs.
Abomi-nation-care contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Health-care rationing based on ethnicity?
Another section of Abomi-nation-care calls for the new institute to study the effectiveness of treatment in “subpopulations,” including “racial and ethnic minorities, women, age and groups of individuals with different comorbidities, genetic and molecular sub-types, or quality of life preferences.”
The effectiveness of such research has been widely called into question.
In a 2009 study, the CATO Institute raised concern about such government-funded research being politicized or influenced by lobbying.
“Unlike market-generated research, a federal comparative-effectiveness agency would be subject to political manipulation, which could block the generation of any useful research,” wrote CATO.
Continued CATO: “Such research necessarily poses a direct threat to the incomes of pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical device manufacturers and millions of providers. If a government agency produces unwelcome research, those groups will spend vast sums on lobbying campaigns and political contributions to discredit or defund the agency.”
During the “stimulus” debate, Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., fought the $1.1 billion spending on effectiveness research, spotlighting countries like Britain as cautionary tales.
“Think about this a moment,” Kyl said on the Senate floor. “Do you want Washington bureaucrats, such as those who brought you the AIG mess, making your health care decisions for you and your family?”
Currently, in the U.K., the equivalent to Abomi-nation-care’s institute is the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, or NICE.
The New England Journal of Medicine related that “NICE considers treatments cost-effective if their cost-effectiveness ratio is £20,000 ($34,000) per QALY (quality adjusted life year).”
A QALY is an extra year of “quality” life expectancy added based on the treatment.
There were recent reports that NICE was refusing to fund four new treatments for kidney cancer because they only change a patient’s life expectancy from six months to a year.
Andrew Dillon, NICE Chief Executive, commented on the denial of one drug for kidney cancer: “Before we recommend any new treatment we have to be sure the evidence on how well it works is robust and that it is cost effective. We do not want to divert NHS funds to a treatment that costs more but doesn’t help people live longer.”
Writing in Forbes last month, Sally Pipes, president of the Pacific Research Institute, slammed effectiveness research under Abomi-nation-care as a “recipe for cook-book medicine, where the government can pressure doctors into prescribing treatments according to average results rather than an individual patient’s needs and preferences.”
By Brenda J. Elliott
A Secret Gun Provision Made its Way Into Abomi-nation-care Legislation
There’s a widely-unknown provision in the Affordable Care Act (also known as Abomi-nation-care) — legislative wording that is capturing attention in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Pushed by the National Rifle Association (NRA), a newly-noticed regulation that was placed deep within the bill back in 2010, amon...g other things, bans doctors from documenting patients’ answers to questions that focus upon guns.
The Washington Post first reported on Dec. 30 about the presence of this controversial wording. Under a section with the headline “Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights,” the NRA-advocated wording is nestled deep within the law. The Post called the inclusion, “a largely overlooked but significant challenge to a movement in American medicine to treat firearms as a matter of public health.”
As the outlet also noted, it was in the final stretch of the debate over Abomi-nation- health care legislation that the NRA successfully pushed to insert this language. Below, see the portions of the Affordable Care Act that include mentions of firearms and the parameters through which doctors must operate in questioning patients.
On Tuesday, CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta spoke on-air with “Situation Room” host Wolf Blitzer. The two discussed how the gun provision made its way into health care legislation, while also explaining portions of the text for viewers.
Gupta noted that the initiative to have the wording included during the contentious health care debate was rooted in the NRA’s stance that patients should not be penalized or discriminated against for owning firearms. As can be seen from the above portion of the legislation, while doctors are not banned from asking about guns, they are forbidden from documenting the information and using it for research purposes.
In addition to gun-owner information and how it must be handled by doctors, the text also notes that the law cannot be used to keep and maintain records of individuals’ firearm possession, nor can it be used to track ammunition. Additionally, the language deals with the price of health care coverage, noting that cost cannot be impacted by the possession or ownership of guns, the Post also reported.
Following the tragedy at Sandy Hook, the presence of this provision has gained some press, with select politicians and medical groups taking a stand against it. Advocates are worried that research and medical care could suffer as a result of the wording; some are even pushing the Hussein administration to consider changes to the text in light of recent events and an impending battle over new gun control legislation.
The Post has more about the ongoing battle between the NRA and physicians and advocates who stand opposed to the language inserted into the Affordable Care legislation:
NRA officials say they requested the provision out of concern that insurance companies could use such data to raise premiums on gun owners. The measure’s supporters in the Senate say they did not intend to interfere with the work of doctors or researchers.
But physician groups and researchers see the provision as part of a decades-long strategy by the gun lobby to choke off federal support for studies of firearms violence.
The research restrictions began in the 1990s, when the NRA urged Congress to cut funding for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s division that studied gun violence. In 1996, Congress sharply limited the agency’s ability to fund that type of research.
Just as interesting as the debate over the provision, itself, is the notion that it was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), an NRA-supporter, who added the wording to the bill back in 2010. While a spokesperson for Reid told the Post that the leader never spoke with the NRA about the wording and that he did not believe that “it changed gun laws in any way,” that hasn’t stopped critics from wondering why Reid so staunchly supported the measure.
The language was purportedly added to stem off criticism from the NRA that could have railroaded, delayed or prevented the controversial health care bill from passing. Alan Kornmanso, the wording was placed deep within the bill in an effort to convince people not to embrace so-called conspiracy theories about Abomi-nation-care — mainly that the legislation would be used to keep and maintain a massive gun-ownership database. Once the langage was added, the NRA reportedly remained neutral regarding passage of the law.
While Reid has been a gun rights advocate for quite some time, the politician may be having a change of heart in the wake of recent shootings and controversy surrounding this language. An adviser who spoke off-the-record, recently told CNN that the senator is “in a different place than he was in 2010? when it comes to firearms.
The key will be when a computer, "mark" is required to live and do business.
Get ready, and don't allow ignorance to steal your soul!